What is a Partnership representative according to the fund terms of the cornerstone LPA?
Looking at the Cornerstone LPA for example, I find there's multiple avenues a GP could choose to deal with a defaulting LP. What's, based on industry experience, the rationale for choosing one over the other, and which ones are the most common? - Removing the LP from the partnership by either considering their interest forfeited or selling it at a discount - Using distributions to cover capital calls - Pursuing legal action And when does it make sense for the GP to waive the interest? I imagine many of these decisions are down to the individual relationship with the LP, so I'd love to know the common/best practice here.
I wonder what are the provisions in the Cornerstone LPA 2.0 that will protect the LP from unjustified termination, such as LP approval of termination and what is the best industry practice to protect LP rights.
With respect to a Cornerstone LPA 2.0 agreement; under what conditions would partners in a venture capital fund give back up to 20% of distributions to satisfy [fund] obligations?